PhD Research
I’m developing a PhD proposal in the open. This section documents that process so it reads the way a supervisor would want it to: a candidate who is already thinking like a researcher — framing questions, engaging the literature, and being honest about gaps and limitations.
Proposed research title
[Working title — refined as the proposal develops.]
Research problem
[The core problem, in a few sentences: what is not yet understood or not yet done, and why it matters.]
Research questions
[The specific, answerable questions the thesis would address.]
Literature review notes
Structured notes on the papers I’m reading — what each claims, how it shows it, what I’d push on, and how it connects to the proposal.
| Date | Title | Categories |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2026 | Ang, Hodrick, Xing & Zhang (2006) — The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns | asset pricing, volatility, cross-section |
Key academic papers
[A curated, growing reading list with one-line relevance notes.]
Research gaps
[Where the current literature stops — the openings a thesis could occupy.]
Methodology ideas
[Candidate methods and study designs, with their trade-offs.]
Supervisor alignment
[How the proposed work aligns with the research of the groups and supervisors I’m targeting — matched to specific interests rather than stated in general terms.]
Datasets
[The data the work would require, and how it would be sourced and handled.]
Experimental roadmap
[A sequenced plan of experiments from proposal to thesis.]
Ethics and limitations
[Ethical considerations, data governance, and the honest limitations of the approach.]
Publication targets
[Candidate venues for the work.]